Comparative analysis of the criteria for goat milk assessment in Ukraine and France


N. Zazharska, T. Fotina, I. Yatsenko, L. Tarasenko, I. Biben, V. Zazharskyi, V. Brygadyrenko, P. Sklyarov

The safety and quality of raw milk in Ukraine remained the biggest problem in the retooling of dairy enterprises by the newest processing lines and modern quality control systems. This research aimed to scientifically substantiate the requirements of the Ukrainian standard for goat milk, especially for indicators of acidity, density, somatic cell count, and bacterial contamination. This requires conducting a comparative analysis of the criteria for assessing the safety and quality of goat milk in Ukraine and abroad to harmonize with the relevant legal documents of the European Union; to conduct monitoring studies on the quality and safety of goat milk in France and Ukraine. The monitoring of indices of goat milk in Ukraine was conducted compared to the similar ones in the laboratory of milk LILCO (Laboratoire Interprofessionnel Laitiere du Centre Ouest - Interprofessional milk laboratory of center and west), Surgères, France. Statistical data of goat milk analyses by seasons were obtained in the laboratory LILCO. Samples of goat milk in Ukraine were taken from farms of Dnipropetrovs’k oblast, Ukraine. The most fat and protein content in goat milk were fixed during winter as in Ukraine also in LILCO, France, significant differences were determined concerning other seasons.

It was found that the existing standard does not meet the international requirements for goat milk based on the leading indicators (bacterial contamination, somatic cells, acidity, and density). The ineffectiveness of the criteria of density and acidity for goat milk assessment was substantiated because of their insignificance. It was proposed to eliminate the requirements for the density and acidity of goat milk from “Goat's milk. Raw. Specifications: DSTU 7006: 2009", to reduce the requirements for the fat and protein content, and to meet the requirements for the somatic cell count and bacterial contamination following European standards.

Keywords: goat milk, fat, protein, somatic cells, density, acidity, season


Aganga A. A., Amarteifio J. O., Nkile N. (2002). Effect of stage of lactation on nutrient composition of Tswana sheep and goat’s milk. Journal of food composition and analysis, 15, 533–543.

Brito J.R., Brito M.A., Lange C., Faria C.G., Moraes L.C., Fonseca R.G, Silva Y.A. (2009). Composition and bulk tank somatic cell counts of milk from dairy goat herds in Southeastern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, 46 (1), 19–24.

Dispositif national de paiement du lait en fonction de sa composition et de sa qualité et gestion des paramètres sanitaires du lait. Ministère de l?agriculture de l?agroalimentaire et de la forêt. DGAL/SDSSA/2014-599. 21.07.2014

Fotina, T. I., Fotina, H. A., Ladyka, V. I., Ladyka, L. M., Zazharska, N. M. (2018). Monitoring research of somatic cells count in goat milk in the eastern region of Ukraine. Journal of the Hellenic Veterinary Medical Society, 69(3), 1101–1108.

Fulton C. (2012). Changement apporté dans la mesure du point de congélation. Infobulletin sur le lait caprin, 12, P. 1.

Greppi G.F., Roncada P., Fortin R. (2008). Protein components of goat’s milk. In: Pulina G.; Cannas A. (Eds.) Dairy goats feeding and nutrition. 2.ed. Bologna: CAB International, 71–94. 

Guo, M. R., Dixon, P. H., Park, Y. W., Gilmore, J. A., & Kindstedt, P. S. (2001). Seasonal Changes in the Chemical Composition of Commingled Goat Milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 84, E79–E83.

Kalyankar S.D., Khedkar C.D., Patil A.M.. (2016) Goat: Milk. In: Caballero, B., Finglas, P., and Toldrá, F. (eds.) The Encyclopedia of Food and Health, 3, 256-260. Oxford: Academic Press.

Leitner G, Lavon Y, Matzrafi Z, Benun O, Bezman D, Merin U. (2016). Somatic cell counts, chemical composition and coagulation properties of goat and sheep bulk tank milk. International Dairy Journal, 58, 9–13.

Maurer, J., Berger, T., Amrein, R., Schaeren, W., Stierli M. (2013). Critères de qualité pour le lait de chèvre et de brebis: exigences et valeurs indicatives ainsi que propositions pour un paiement du lait selon des caractéristiques qualitatives. ALP Forum, 97, 1–16.

National Standards of Ukraine (DSTU) 7006:2009 ”Goat's Milk. Raw. Specifications”.

Regulation (EC) No. 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin. Official European Journal Union L139/55 30.04.2004.

Sklyarov, P., Fedorenko, S., Naumenko, S., Antonenko, P., Zazharskyi, V., Mylostyvyi, R., Zazharska, N.  (2020). Oxidant/Antioxidant Balance in Cows and Sheep in Antenatal Pathology. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 10(5), 26–28. doi:10.15421/2020_201

Souza G., Brito J. R. F., Aparecida M., Brito V. P., Lange C., Faria C., Moraes L., Fonseca R. . G., Silva Y. (2009) Composition and bulk somatic cell counts of milk from dairy goat herds in Southeastern Brazil. Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, 46, 19–24.

Vasylieva, N. (2017). Economic aspects of food security in Ukrainian meat and milk clusters. Agris On-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 9 (3), 81-92.

Wanniatie, V, Sudarwanto, M.B., Purnawarman, T, Jayanegara, A (2019). Comparison of microbiological quality between organic and conventional goat milk: a study case in bogor, Indonesia. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 7(7): 593-598.

Yangilar, F. (2013). As a potentially functional food: Goats’ milk and products. J. Food Nutr. Res., 1(4), 68–81.

Zazharska, N. M. (2016). Bacterial contamination of milk at different temperatures and shelf life. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology, 18(3(70)), 108–112.

Zazharska, N., Boyko, O., & Brygadyrenko, V. (2018). Influence of diet on the productivity and characteristics of goat milk. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 52(5), 711–717.

Zazharskyi V., Davydenko P., Kulishenko O., Borovik I., Brygadyrenko V., Zazharska N. (2019) Antibacterial activity of herbal infusions against Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro. Magyar állatorvosok lapja, 141(11), 693–704.

Share this article