Forest species diversity in river watersheds of the Left-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine

Abstract

O. Bondar, Olha Adamenko, H. Korobkova, Ye. Hryn, N. Tsytsiura, O. Zaiarna, O. Halahan, O. Chalaya, Ye. Pavlushenko, S. Stankevych, A. Matsyura

Species diversity of forests in basins of the rivers Sula, Vorskla, Psel, and Seversky Donets and their tributaries (on the territory of Ukraine) are analyzed. The research aimed to identify forest species diversity in 109 watersheds of the rivers Sula, Vorskla, Psel, and Seversky Donets and determine the share of forests in the origin and composition of plantations in the river basins. To delineate the boundaries of 109 catchment areas of the Sula, Psel, Vorskla, and Seversky Donets rivers, the MapInfo Professional 12.5 and a vector map of Ukraine were used. After defining the boundaries of 109 river basins, a vector layer of forest stands (which are subordinated to the State Forest Resources Agency of Ukraine) was applied, and the distribution database of these rivers was formed. It was determined that 63 species of trees were identified in the study region, the most common of which are common oak and Scots pine. The distribution of several tree species on 109 river basins is analyzed. Thus, the most significant number of tributaries (50%) has concentrated from 11 to 20 species of trees, slightly less number of tributaries (24 and 22%) represented 1-10 and 21-30 species, and the smallest number of tributaries (6 and 2%) represented 31-40 and 41-50%, respectively. Mixed plantations dominate (61% of the total forest area) in the river basin; pure plantations are the rest (39%)
 

References

 

Álvarez-López V., Zappelini C., Durand A. & Chalot. M. (2020). Pioneer trees of Betula pendula at a red gypsum landfill harbour  specific structure and composition of root-associated microbial communities. Science of The Total Environment, 726, 138530.

Bartha S., Merolli A., Campetella G. & Canullo R. (2008). Changes of vascular plant diversity along a chronosequence of beech coppice stands, central Apennines, Italy. Plant Biosystems, 142, 572–583.

Bengtsson J., Nilsson S.G., Franc A. & Menozzi P. (2000). Biodiversity, disturbances, ecosystem function, and management of European forests. Forest Ecology and Managemen, 132, 39–50.

Beyer F., Hertel D., Jung K. Fender A. & Leuschner Ch. (2013). Competition effects on fine root survival of Fagus sylvatica and Fraxinus excelsior. Forest Ecology and Management, 302, 14–22.

Bielak K., Dudzi?ska M. & Pretzsch H. (2014). Mixed stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst] can be more productive than monocultures. Evidence from over 100 years of observation of long-term experiments. Forest Systems, 23, 573–589.

Bílek L., Remeš J. & Zahradník D. (2011). Managed vs. unmanaged. Structure of beech forest stands (Fagus sylvatica L.) after 50 years of development, Central Bohemia. Forest Systems, 20 (1), 122–138.

Bílek L., Remeš J., Podrázský V. Rozenbergar D., Diaci J., Zahradník D. (2014). Gap regeneration in near-natural European beech forest stands in Central Bohemia-the role of heterogeneity and micro-habitat factors. Dendrobiology, 71, 59–71.

Bondar O., Rumiantsev M., Tkach L. & Obolonyk I. (2020). Prevailing forest types in the river catchments within the Left-Bank Forest-Steppe zone, Ukraine. Folia Forestalia Polonica, Series A and Forestry, 62 (2), 100–113.

Buhaiov S.M., Pasternak V.P. & Bila Y.M. (2019). Tablytsi khodu rostu modalnykh vilkhovykh derevostaniv Livoberezhnoho Lisostepu Ukrainy UNFU Scientific Bulletin, 29 (3), 13–17 (in Ukrainian).

Chudomelová M., Hédl R., Zouhar V. & Szabó P. (2017). Open oakwoods facing modern threats: Will they survive the next fifty years? Biological Conservation, 210, 163–173.

Conte E., Lombardi F., Battipaglia C. Palombo G, Altieri S., La Porta, Marchetti M. Tognetti R. (2018). Growth dynamics, climate sensitivity and water use efficiency in pure vs. mixed pine and beech stands in Trentino (Italy). Forest Ecology and Management, 409, 707–718.

Davydenko K., Borysova V., Shcherbak O. Kryshtop Y. & Meshkova V. (2019). Situation and perspectives of European ash (Fraxinus spp.) in Ukraine: focus on eastern border. Baltic forestry, 25 (1), 193–202.

Deptu?a M., Piernik A., Nienartowicz A. Hulisz P. & Kami?ski D. (2020). Alnus glutinosa L. Gaertn. as potential tree for brackish and saline habitats. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22, e00977.

Garmash A.V. (2019). Pine stands of Forest-Steppe zone of Kharkiv Region: productivity and natural regeneration. Forestry and Forest Melioration, 135, 14–23.

Hédl R., Kopecký M. & Komárek J. (2010). Half a century of succession in a temperate oakwood: from species-rich community to mesic forest. Diversity and Distributions, 16, 267–276.

Jactel H. & Brockerhoff E.G. (2007). Tree diversity reduces herbivory by forest insects. Ecology Letters, 10, 835–848.

Králícek I., Vacek Z., Vacek S. Remeš J., Bulušek D., Král J., Štefancík I. Putalová T. (2017). Dynamics and structure of mountain autochthonous spruce-beech forests: impact of hilltop phenomenon, air pollutants and climate. Dendrobiology, 77, 121–139.

Lisove hospodarstvo Ukrainy (2019). ECO-inform, Kyiv, Ukraine. Available at: http://ekoinform.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Brosura_DALR_2019_UA-web.pdf (in Ukrainian)

Mölder A., Bernhardt-Römermann, M. & Schmidt W. (2008). Herb-layer diversity in deciduous forests: raised by tree richness or beaten by beech? Forest Ecology and Management, 256, 272–281.

Ngo Bieng M.A., Perot T., de Coligny F. & Goreaud F. (2013). Spatial pattern of trees in uences Forest Ecology and Management species productivity in a mature oak–pine mixed forest. European Journal of Forest Research, 132, 841–850.

Niccoli F., Pelleri F., Manetti M.C., Sansone, D. & Battipaglia G. (2020). Effects of thinning intensity on productivity and water use efficiency of Quercus robur L, Forest Ecology and Management, 473, 118282.

Ostapenko B.F. & Tkach V.P. (2002). Forest typology. Kharkiv. Pleyada, 204 p.

Petritan I.C., Marzano R., Petritan, A.M. & Lingua, E. (2014). Overstory succession in a mixed Quercus petraea–Fagus sylvatica old growth forest revealed through the spatial pattern of competition and mortality. Forest Ecology and Management, 326 (15), 9–17.

Pretzsch H., Rio M., Ammer Ch. Avdagic, A., Barbeito, I., Bielak K., Brazaitis G., Coll L., Dirnberger G., Drössler L., Fabrika M., Forrester D., Godvod K., Heym, M., Hurt, V., Kurylyak V., Löf M., Lombardi, F., Matovi?, B., Mohren, F., Motta R., den Ouden, J., Pach, M., Ponette Q., Schütze G., Schweig J., Skrzyszewski J., Sramek V., Sterba H., Stojanovi?, D., Svoboda M., Vanhellemont M., Verheyen K., Wellhausen K., Zlatanov T., Bravo-Oviedo, A. (2015). Growth and yield of mixed versus pure stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) analysed along a productivity gradient through Europe. European Journal of Forest Research, 134, 927–947.

Pretzsch H. & Schütze G. (2015). Effect of tree species mixing on the size structure, density, and yield of forest stands. European Journal of Forest Research, 135, 1–22.

Pretzsch H. & Rais A. (2016). Wood quality in complex forests versus even-aged monocultures: review and perspectives. Wood Science and Technology, 50, 845–880.

Pretzsch H., Rio M., Schütze G Ammer, C., Annighöfer, P., Avdagi?, A., Barbeito, I., Bielak, K., Brazaitis, G., Coll, L., Drössler, L., Fabrika, M., Forrester, D., Kurylyak, V., Löf, M., Lombardi, F., Matovi?, B., Mohren, F., Motta, R., den Ouden, J., Pach, M., Skrzyszewski, J., Sramek, V., Sterba, H., Svoboda, M., Verheyen, K., Zlatanov, T., Bravo-Oviedo, A. (2016). Mixing of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) enhances structural heterogeneity, And the effect increases with water availability. Forest Ecology and Management, 373, 149–166.

Río M.D. & Sterba, H. (2009). Comparing volume growth in pure and mixed stands of Pinus sylvestris and Quercus pyrenaica.  Annals of Forest Science, 66 (5), 1–11.

Sharma A., Cory B., McKeithen J. & Frazier J. (2020). Structural diversity of the longleaf pine ecosystem. Forest Ecology and Management, 462, 117987.

Sjölund M.J. & Jump A.S. (2015). Coppice management of forests impacts spatial genetic structure but not genetic diversity in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Forest Ecology and Management, 336, 65–71.

Sydorenko S.H., (2017). Postpyrogenic growth of Scots pine stands in the Left-bank ForestSteppe of Ukraine. PhD. Kharkiv, 191?.

Tkach V.P., (1999). Floodplain forest of Ukraine. Kharkiv. Pravo, 368 p.

Tkach V., Rumiantsev M., Kobets O., Luk’yanets V. & Musienko S. (2019). Ukrainian plain oak forests and their natural regeneration. Forestry Studies, 71(1), 17–29.

Tkach V.P. & Mieshkova V.L. (2019). Modern problems of formation and reproduction of biologically stable pine forests of Ukraine in conditions of climate change. ?ine forests: current status, existing challenges and ways forward. Proceedings of International Scientific and Practical Conference 12-13 June 2019 Kyiv, Ukraine, 70–77.

Tkach V., Bondar O. & Rumiantsev, M. (2020). Pedunculate oak stands in the catchments of the river Vorskla's tributaries. Folia Oecologica, 47 (1), 70–80.

Tyschenko O.M. (2018). Silvicultural and taxational characteristics of Chernihiv Polissya birch forest stands. Scientific Bulletin of UNFU, 28 (10), 49–52.

Vacek S., Bastl M. & Leps J. (1999). Vegetation changes in forests of the Krkonose Mts over a period of air pollution stress (1980–1995). Plant Ecology, 143, 1–11.

Vacek S., Vacek Z., Bílek L., Simon J., Remeš J., H?nová I., Král J., Putalová, T. Mikeska, M. (2016). Structure, regeneration and growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands with respect to changing climate and environmental pollution. Silva Fennica, 50, 1564.

Vacek Z., Vacek S., Podrázský V., Král J., Bulušek D., Putalová T., Baláš M., Kalousková, I. Schwarz, O. (2016). Structural diversity and production of alder stands on former agricultural land at high altitudes. Dendrobiology, 75, 31–44.

Vacek S., Vacek Z., Ulbrichová I. Bulušek D., Prok?pková A., Král J., Van?ura K. (2019). Biodiversity dynamics of differently managed lowland forests left to spontaneous development in Central Europe. Austrian Journal of Forest Science, 136, 249–281.

Van Calste H., Baeten L., Verheyen K., De Keersmaeker L., Dekeyser S., Rogister J.E., Hermy M. (2008). Diverging effects of overstorey conversion scenarios on the understorey vegetation in a former coppice-with-standards forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 256 (4), 519–528.

Vedmid M.M., Meshkova V.L. & Zhezhkun A.M. (2006). Algorithm for reveal of low valuable young stands in the oakeries by forest inventory data. Forestry and Forest Melioration, 110, 54–58.

Vild O., Rolecek J., Hédl R. Kopecký M. & Utínek D. (2013). Experimental restoration of coppice-with-standards: Response of understorey vegetation from the conservation perspective. Forest Ecology and Management, 310, 234–241.

Von Oheimb G. & Brunet, J. (2007). Dalby Söderskog revisited: long-term vegetation changes in a south Swedish deciduous forest. Acta Oecologica, 31, 229–242.

Zahalna kharakterystyka lisiv Ukrainy (2011). State Agency of Forest Resources of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine. Available at: http://dklg.kmu.gov.ua/forest/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=62921 (in Ukrainian)

Zeller L., Ammer Ch., Annighöfer P., Biber P., Marshall J., Schütze G., Gaztelurrutia R. M., Pretzsch, H. (2017). Tree ring wood density of Scots pine and European beech lower in mixed-species stands compared with monocultures. Forest Ecology and Management, 400, 363–374.

Keywords: tree species, Sula River, Psel River, Vorskla River, Seversky Donets River

Share this article