Pathomorphological changes in laying hens organs in case of infection by a field strain of the Mareks disease virus


O.M. Shchebentovska, A.K. Kostyniuk, Ya. Yu. Veremchuk, Z.V. Khomenko, Yu. Ya. Fedyk, A. S. Revunets, S. S. Zaika

In small private farms, Marek’s disease is one of the causes of laying hens’ death, especially in case of a spontaneous infection by a field strain of the virus. For several decades, the disease has been successfully prevented using vaccination. However, the vaccines’ effectiveness decreases over time due to the emergence of more virulent strains. Economic losses from the disease are caused by the high mortality rate, reduced poultry productivity, and the additional financial burden on implementing veterinary measures. Marek’s disease is still being registered in all countries worldwide that have the developed poultry farming industry.

The article highlights the results of the autopsy and histopathological studies of the organs of laying hens of the Leghorn breed in various age groups (120 to 350 days) affected by the field strain of Marek’s disease virus. During the disease period, sick fowl lost its productivity sharply, and the mortality rate accounted for 35% (150 hens). The main clinical signs were exhaustion, paresis of the wings, atypical gait, and neck curvature (in some cases). The fowl with the feet oriented in different directions was not detected. The autopsy results revealed tumors on the liver, heart, kidneys, spleen, and ovaries in most hens. Macroscopically, affected organs are enlarged, with miliary proliferates, especially the spleen. Histologically, diffuse massive infiltration and proliferation of pleomorphic lymphoid cells into the liver’s parenchyma, heart muscle, lungs, spleen, pancreas, kidney, and glandular stomach were detected. Morphological changes in the spleen were characterized by lymphocyte pleomorphism and necrosis of the reactive centers of lymphoid nodules. Massive diffuse foci of lymphoblast proliferation were found in the glandular stomach. Areas of lymphoblast proliferation with significant damage to the parenchyma, hemorrhage, and stasis were found in the liver and kidneys. Characteristic lymphoid infiltrations were also discovered in the peripheral nerves of some laying hens.

Keywords:  splenomegaly, necrosis, perivascular clutches, proliferation, edema, lymphoblasts


Baaten, B. J., Butter, C., Davison, T. F. (2004). Study of host-pathogen interactions to identify sustainable vaccine strategies to Marek’s disease. Vet Immunol Immunopathol.  100  (3-4),165-77.  Doi,10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.04.009. 

Biggs,  P.  M.  (2001).  The  History  and  Biology  of  Marek’s Disease Virus. In, Hirai K. (eds) Marek’s Disease. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, Vol. 255. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Doi,  10.1007/978-3-642-56863-3_1.

Biggs, P. M., Powell, D. G., Churchill, A. E. & Chubb, R. C. (1972). The epizootiology of Marek’s disease, I. Incidence of antibody, Viraemia and Marek’s disease in six flocks, Avian Pathology, 1,1, 5-25.

Doi, 10.1080/03079457208418048.

Calnek, B. W. (2001). Pathogenesis of Marek’s Disease Virus Infection. In, Hirai K. (eds) Marek’s Disease. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol 255. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Doi, 10.1007/978-3-642-56863-3_2.

Calnek, B. W. & Richard, L. Witter (1985). Marek’s Disease - A Model for Herpesvirus Oncology, CRC Critical Reviews in Microbiology, 12,4, 293-320. Doi, 10.3109/10408418509104432.

Cui, X., Lee, L. F., Hunt, H. D., Reed, W. M., Lupiani, B., Reddy, S. M. (2005). A Marek’s disease virus vil-8 deletion mutant has attenuated virulence and confers protection against challenge with a very virulent plus strain. Avian Dis. 49, 199–206. Doi,10.3390/vaccines9020159.

Davison, F., Nair, V. (2005). Use of Marek’s disease vaccines, could they be driving the virus to increasing virulence? Expert Rev Vaccines. 4(1),77-88. doi,10.1586/14760584.4.1.77.

Frank, F. (2001). Marek’s disease, History, actual and future perspectives. Lohmann Inform, 25,1-5.

Kezawa, M., Goryo, M.,  Sasaki, J., Haridy, M. and Okada, K. (2010).  Late Marek’s Disease in Adult Chickens Inoculated with Virulent Marek’s Disease Virus. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 72(12),1539–1545. Doi.10.1292/jvms.10-0203.

Kiceli, D. (1962). Prakticheckaja mikpotehnika i gictohimija. Budapesht (in Russian).

Lawn, A. M., Watson, J. S. (1982). Ultrastructure of the central nervous system in Marek’s disease and the effect of route of infection on lesion incidence in the central nervous system. Avian Pathol. 11(2),213-25. Doi, 10.1080/03079458208436095.

Merkulov, G. A. (1969). Kurc patologicheckoj tehniki. L. (in Russian).

Nazerian, K., Solomon, J. J., Witter, R. L., Burmester, B. R. (1968). Studies on the Etiology of Marek’s Disease. II. Finding of a Herpesvirus in Cell Culture. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. 127(1),177-182. Doi,10.3181/00379727-127-32650.

Osterrieder, N., Kamil, J., Schumacher, D. et al. (2006). Marek’s disease virus, from miasma to model. Nat Rev Microbiol 4, 283–294. Doi, 10.1038/nrmicro1382.

Othman, I., Aklilu, E. (2019). Marek’s disease herpesvirus serotype 1 in broiler breeder and layer chickens in Malaysia. Veterinary World, 12 (3), 472-476. Doi,10.14202/vetworld.2019.472-476.

Payne, L. N., Biggs, P. M. (1967). Studies onMarek’s disease. II. Pathogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 39 (2),281-302. PMID, 18623945.

Payne, L. N., Venugopal, K. (2010). Neoplastic diseases, Marek’s disease, avian leukosis and reticuloendotheliosis. Rev. Sci. Tech., 19 (2), 544-564.

Pejovi?, N., Velhner Maja, Pola?ek, V.,  Aleksi?-Kova?evi? Sanja, Marinkovi?, D., Kne?evi? Milijana.  (2007). Morphological and immunohistochemical examination of tumor cells in Marek’s disease. Acta veterinaria. Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages, 27-35. Doi,10.2298/AVB0701027P.

Peter, M. Biggs & Venugopal Nair (2012). The long view, 40 years of Marek’s disease research and Avian Pathology, Avian Pathology, 41,1, 3-9. 

Simu, G., Ciobanu, H., Ciobanu-Bîlc, A. (1980). Histological aspects of lymphoid organs in chickens with Marek’s disease. Morphol Embryol (Bucur). 26 (4),345-7. PMID, 6450886.

Stamilla, A. (2020). Morphological and Immunohistochemical Examination of Lymphoproliferative Lesions Caused by Marek’s Disease Virus in Breeder Chickens, Animals, 10 (8), 1280. Doi, 10.3390/ani10081280.

Suma, U. S., Rahman, M. W., Nooruzzaman, M., Chowdhury, E. H. and Islam, M. R. (2017). Pathology of Marek’s disease in layer chickens in Bangladesh. The Bangladesh Veterinarian, 34 (2), 35– 41.

Witter, R. (1997). Increased Virulence of Marek’s Disease Virus Field Isolates. Avian Diseases, 41(1), 149-163. Doi, 10.2307/1592455.

Witter, R. L, Calnek, B. W., Buscaglia, C., Gimeno, I. M., Schat, K. A. (2005). Classification of Marek’s disease viruses according to pathotype, philosophy and methodology. Avian Pathol 34, 75-90.

Witter, R. L. (2001). Protective efficacy of Marek’s disease vaccines. In, Hirai K (ed) Current topics in microbiology and immunology. Springer, Berlin, pp. 58-90.

Witter, R., Sharma, J., & Fadly, A. (1980). Pathogenicity of Variant Marek’s Disease Virus Isolants in Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Chickens. Avian Diseases, 24 (1), 210-232. Doi,10.2307/1589781.

Share this article