The Relationship between philosophy and technology in the agricultural development approach

Abstract

M.M. Vajari, S.J.F. Hosseini, S.M. Mirdamadi, M. Akrami

This research studies the relationship between philosophy and technology in the agricultural development approach. It was necessary to carry out this research due to the lack of sufficient knowledge of the philosophical nature of agricultural technology, which has led to the reliance on the creation of unthinking, unrealistic, non-end-oriented, and non-humanistic technology inconsistent with original nature. The methodology of this research was a qualitative research method of discourse analysis based on Laclau and Mouffe's approach, which is an analytical-descriptive, yet critical, approach. The research tool was a face-to-face interview, a written interview, and a questionnaire. Samples selected for the interview were philosophers (Iranian and non-Iranians) and experts in technology-related research areas. In this research, following the interview and implementation of texts, 9 sub-sets of discourse semantic system were extracted and analyzed in the form of a key discourse of technology philosophy including technology discourse, freedom discourse in the technological world, existential discourse in technology philosophy, engineering discourse in technology philosophy, idealism discourse in technology philosophy, discourse of the development of meaning in technological civilization, discourse of agricultural philosophy, discourse of the effectiveness of philosophical schools on the formation and development of technology philosophy, and prospective discourse (based on imagination) in the global technological system.

Keywords: Technology; philosophy of technology; agricultural philosophy; philosophy of agricultural promotion and education; machinery

References:
Adler, P. S. (1990). Marx, machines, and skill. Technology and Culture, 31(4), 780-812. http://www.jstor.org/stble/3105907.
Arabi, M., Mennati, H. (2010). Technology Strategy. Tehran: Mahkame Publications.
Arabiyoon, A., Popzan, A. Choosing the right technology for agricultural development and rural development in Iran. Jahad Journal, 18(212-213), 69-84.
Barrett, W. (1979). The Illusion of Technique: A Search for Meaning in a Technological Civilization, Garden City, Doubleday, Iran, Abadan, Printing by Porsesh.
Heller, A. (2002). The Frankfurt School. Rethinking the Frankfurt School: Alternative Legacies of Cultural Critique, SUNY, Albany, 207-21.
Dusek, V. (2006). Philosophy of technology: An introduction. MaldenOxfordCarlston: Blackwell, 90.
Viatte, G. (2001). Adopting technologies for sustainable farming systems: an OECD perspective. In Adoption of Technologies for Sustainable Farming Systems Wageningen Workshop Proceedings, p. 14.
Franssen, M. (2009). Analytic Philosophy of Technology. A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology, 184-188.
Fernando, J. I. (2003). Marx and technology. Prajñā Vihāra, 4(2).
Glenn, A. (2009). Technology as a philosophical phenomenon. Translator: Manouchehr, Sanei Dare Bidi. Hekmat & Marefat monthly magazine, 44, pp: 4-9.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology, and other essays.
Heidegger, M. (1971). Building dwelling thinking. Poetry, language, thought, 154.
Heidegger, M. (1927). 1962 Being and time. Trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. San Francisco: Harper and Row.
Habermas, J. (1971). Science and technology as ideology. Towards a rational society, 85ff.
Ihde, D. (1983). The historical-ontological priority of Technology over Science. In Philosophy and technology (pp. 235-252). Springer, Dordrecht.
Jonas, H. (1979). Toward a philosophy of technology. Hastings Center Report, 9(1), 34-43.
Judaki, M. (2010). Comparing Marshall McLuhan's Views with Iranian Society. http://jodaki.blogsky.com/1389/06/09/Post-55/
Kline, S. J. (1985). What is Technology? Bulletin of science, Technology & Society 5(3). 215-218.
Khoshnevis, Y. (2014). An Introduction to Technology Philosophy. Tarjoman Website.
Kaji, H. (2013). Down ID technology philosophy, a response to technological determinism. Tehran, Hermes Publications.
Mackenzie, D. (1984). Marx and machine. Iran, Markaz.
Moqadami, A. (2011). Laclau and Mouffe's discourse analysis theory and its critique. Marefat Farhangi Journal, 2.
Mitcham, C., & Mackey, R. (Eds.). (1983). Philosophy and technology. Simon and Schuster, 80.
Mumford, L. (2003). Tool-users vs. homo sapiens and the megamachine. Philosophy of technology: The technological condition: An anthology. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.(Original work published 1966). www.tarjoman.com
Nowroozi, F. Philosophy of Technology by Looking at Martin Heidegger's Theories.
Nasr, H. (2015). National Conference on Culture and Technology; A cultural hesitation in the fast-paced path of industrialization. Mehr News Agency. http://New-philosophy.ir/p=25
Postman, N. (1993). Technology: the surrender of culture to technology (Vintage).
Artz, J. M. (2001). Thinking About Technology: Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology, Joseph C. Pitt. Ethics and Information Technology, 2(4), 249.
Rorty, R. (1991). Essays on Heidegger and others: philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.
Shariati, A. 1971. Features of the New Century: Machine in Machinism Captivity.
Tiles, M., & Oberdiek, H. (2013). Conflicting Vision of Technology. Philosophy of Technology: The Technological condition, 2, 249-259. www.tarjoman.com
Torabi, T., Muhammad, Z., Asl, N. (2010). Globalization, foreign investment and technology transfer. Islamic Azad University Press, Science and Research Branch.
Tavakkoli, A. (2000) Technology and agricultural promotion. Conference on Future Science and Technology at Strategic Research Center. Tarvijo88.blogfa.com/post-8.aspx
Vermaas, P., Kroes, P., van de Poel, I., Franssen, M., & Houkes, W. (2011). A philosophy of technology: from technical artefacts to sociotechnical systems. Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology, and Society, 6(1), 1-134.
Vietta, S. (2011). Heidegger's criticism of National Socialism and of technology . Walter de Gruyter, Chicago.
Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics?. Daedalus, 121-136.
Wettstein, A. A. (1984). Re-Viewing Tillich in a Technological Culture. Theonomy and Autonomy: Studies in Paul Tillich’s Engagement with Modern Culture, 113-133.
Zare, M. A. (2010). Technology Philosophy. Science and Technology, Tehran University.
 

Share this article