The philosophy of environmental management: evolution of the scientific conceptions

Abstract

L.M. Hren, M.K. Chebotarev, A.V. Ruban, V.O. Shvedun, S.I. Sysoieva, S.V. Stankevych, L.N. Smirnova, A.S. Sokolov

It is noted that the knowledge of mutual connection of the processes taking place in nature moves forward thanks to four great discoveries in natural science: discovery of the cell; law of conservation and transformation of energy; evolutionary teachings of Darwin and creation of a periodic system of elements by D.I. Mendeleyev. It is emphased that based on the use of industrial and domestic waste, there is a saving of huge state funds for purification of environmental pollution, preservation of humanity from abnormal natural pollution of environment (an environmental emergency on a global scale and a biological emergency originating from living creatures and organisms). It is proved that receiving from the environment of means of livelihood in necessary quantity, which were completely restored due to natural processes of biotic circulation, people returned to the biosphere what was used by other living beings for the activity. It is underlined that scientific research carried out by academic and sectoral institutions on environmental issues should be expanded; it is needed to ensure the development and implementation of scientifically sound environmental and economic standards that determine environmental requirements for economic activities.

Key words: environmental management, natural processes, environmental pollution, environmental emergency, knowledge about nature
 

References

 

Drengson, A. & Inoue, Y. (Eds.). (1995). The deep ecology movement. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.

Eckersley, R. (1992). Environmentalism and political theory. Albany: SUNY Press.

Elliott, R. (1982). Faking nature. Inquiry, 25, 81–93.

Elliott, R., & Gare, A. (Eds.). (1983). Environmental philosophy. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.

Fox, W. (1989). The deep ecology-ecofeminism debate and its parallels. Environmental Ethics, 11, 5–25.

Gare, A. (1996). Nihilism Inc: Environmental destruction and the metaphysics of sustainability. Como: Eco-logical Press.

Godfrey-Smith, W. (1982). The rights of non-humans and intrinsic values. In D. Mannison, M. McRobbie, & R. Routley (Eds.), Environmental philosophy, 30–47.

Graham, M. (1999). Some thoughts about the philosophical underpinnings of aboriginal worldviews. Worldviews, 3, 105–118.

Malpas, J.E. (1999). Place and experience: A philosophical topography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mathews, F. (2006). Beyond modernity and tradition: A third way for development. Ethics and the Environment, 11(2), 85–114.

Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. New York: Harper and Rowe.

Plumwood, V. (1999). The struggle for environmental philosophy in Australia. Worldviews, 3(2), 157–178.

Rose, D. B. (2009). Philosophical animism. In Val Plumwood Memorial Lecture at Minding Animals Conference, Newcastle. URL: http://ecologicalhumanities.org

See, Ch. Uhl. (2003). Developing Ecological Consciousness: Path to a Sustainable World. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.

See, J. M. & Molly, Yo.Br. (1998). Coming Back to Life: Practices to Reconnect Our Lives, Our World, Gabriola Island. B.C.: New Society Publishers.

Sinatra, J., & Murphy, P. (Eds.). (1999). Listen to the people, listen to the land. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

Tacey, D. (2011). Ecopsychology and the Sacred: The psychological basis of the environmental crisis. Spring Journal, 83, 329–351.

Thompson,  J. (1990). A refutation of environmental ethics. Environmental Ethics, 12, 147–160.

Share this article